Inspired by this issue on objc.io I decided to try out BDD on my new project. Here is my problem: I want to test that MYCredentialStorage somehow persists credentials I ask it to store, namely that next time app is launched I would get the very same credential. MYCredentialStorage uses keychain, so I could mock it and verify that SecItemAdd or SecItemUpdate functions are called, but I am not supposed to test (or know of) MYCredentialStorage’s private methods, right?
I’m sure I’m not the only one faced this problem, so I’m asking for your advice since I’m very new to BDD.
Thank you in advance.
Advice on BDD for iOS needed
121 Views Asked by dariaa At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in IOS
- Best way to make an HABTM association via console
- undefined method `namespace' for main:Object (NoMethodError) - active record / rakefile
- Ruby destroy is not working? Or objects still present?
- Trying to set the value of an input with mechanize
- How to split the logic in a ruby game
- How can I monitor an endpoint's status with Ruby?
- Why can a private class method be explicitly invoked in Ruby?
- Rails - Ajax do not work properly on production server
- syntax error, unexpected kEND
- Carrierwave file upload with different file types
Related Questions in UNIT-TESTING
- Best way to make an HABTM association via console
- undefined method `namespace' for main:Object (NoMethodError) - active record / rakefile
- Ruby destroy is not working? Or objects still present?
- Trying to set the value of an input with mechanize
- How to split the logic in a ruby game
- How can I monitor an endpoint's status with Ruby?
- Why can a private class method be explicitly invoked in Ruby?
- Rails - Ajax do not work properly on production server
- syntax error, unexpected kEND
- Carrierwave file upload with different file types
Related Questions in BDD
- Best way to make an HABTM association via console
- undefined method `namespace' for main:Object (NoMethodError) - active record / rakefile
- Ruby destroy is not working? Or objects still present?
- Trying to set the value of an input with mechanize
- How to split the logic in a ruby game
- How can I monitor an endpoint's status with Ruby?
- Why can a private class method be explicitly invoked in Ruby?
- Rails - Ajax do not work properly on production server
- syntax error, unexpected kEND
- Carrierwave file upload with different file types
Related Questions in XCTEST
- Best way to make an HABTM association via console
- undefined method `namespace' for main:Object (NoMethodError) - active record / rakefile
- Ruby destroy is not working? Or objects still present?
- Trying to set the value of an input with mechanize
- How to split the logic in a ruby game
- How can I monitor an endpoint's status with Ruby?
- Why can a private class method be explicitly invoked in Ruby?
- Rails - Ajax do not work properly on production server
- syntax error, unexpected kEND
- Carrierwave file upload with different file types
Related Questions in OCMOCK
- Best way to make an HABTM association via console
- undefined method `namespace' for main:Object (NoMethodError) - active record / rakefile
- Ruby destroy is not working? Or objects still present?
- Trying to set the value of an input with mechanize
- How to split the logic in a ruby game
- How can I monitor an endpoint's status with Ruby?
- Why can a private class method be explicitly invoked in Ruby?
- Rails - Ajax do not work properly on production server
- syntax error, unexpected kEND
- Carrierwave file upload with different file types
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular # Hahtags
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
From the comments
Michał Ciuba wrote:
Take a look at another article from the same objc.io issue - dependency injection: objc.io/issue-15/dependency-injection.html. Basically you can inject a mock of keychain into MYCredentialStorage (but maybe you'll need to create a wrapper for SecItem* methods).
Ben Flynn wrote:
I agree with @MichałCiuba - there's no generic way to express that an item will persist between executions of your app. If you're going the DI route, I'd do what he says. If you aren't doing DI, I wouldn't be shy about mocking the keychain storage or your private methods. I'd be explicit in the naming of the test to express exactly what the expectations are.