My intention was to use arbitrary functions as First Class Variables. I used the visitor pattern (at least i think that's what that is) to achieve effectively arbitrary functions as First Class Variables.
Is there a better way to achieve this? Except for safety, is there a big drawback in this design?
Here is a minimal working example, using boost 1.76.0 and C++20 standard:
boost::variant<void*,int> rep (){
return 2;
}
boost::variant<void*,int> oll(){
std::cout << "happiness" << std::endl;
return nullptr;
}
boost::variant<void*,int> iuu(int a ){
return a;
}
class my_visitor : public boost::static_visitor<boost::variant<void*,int>>
{
public:
boost::variant<void*,int> operator()(boost::variant<void*,int>(*fun)() ) const
{
return fun();
}
boost::variant<void*,int> operator()(boost::variant<void*,int>(*fun)(int) ) const
{
return fun(argument);
}
int argument;
};
int main() {
boost::variant<boost::variant<void*,int>(*)(), boost::variant<void*,int>(*)(int)> varob(iuu);
my_visitor vis = my_visitor();
vis.argument = 22;
std::cout << boost::apply_visitor(vis, varob);