I'm trying to define Relation a b as a Category instance. It seems to me that the composer operator is well defined and respects the associative law. When it comes to the id, I can't find a correct definition. What am I doing wrong?
import Data.Map as M
import Data.Set as S
import Control.Category as Cat
newtype Relation a b = R (Map a (Set b)) deriving (Show, Eq)
-- instance Cat.Category Relation where
-- id =
-- (.) = (°)
-- GHC.Base.id r1
-- > R (fromList [(10,fromList "abef"),(30,fromList "GRTXa")])
r1 = R $ M.fromList [(10,S.fromList "abfe"),(30,S.fromList "aXGRT")]
r2 = R $ M.fromList [('a',S.fromList [Just "Apple",Just "Ask"]),('b',S.fromList [Just "book",Just "brother"]),('T',S.fromList [Just "Table"]),('?',S.fromList [Just "Apple",Just "brother"])]
-- ex. r1 ° r2 = R (fromList [(10,fromList [Just "Apple",Just "Ask",Just "book",Just "brother"]),(30,fromList [Just "Apple",Just "Ask",Just "Table"])])
(°) :: (Ord a, Ord k, Ord b) => Relation a k -> Relation k b -> Relation a b
R mp1 ° R mp2
| M.null mp1 || M.null mp2 = R M.empty
| otherwise = R $ M.foldrWithKey (\k s acc -> M.insert k (S.foldr (\x acc2 -> case M.lookup x mp2 of
Nothing -> acc2
Just s2 -> S.union s2 acc2
) S.empty s) acc
) M.empty mp1
Relationcannot be an instance ofCategory:as luqui points out in the comments,
Relationonly represents finite relations (when viewed as sets of pairs), but the identity relation on an infinite set is infinite;composition is not defined on all types, only on instances of
Ord.Here's one way to address those issues and make
Relationan instance ofCategory:Option);Ordinstances.This can be done using GADTs.