I am trying to make a tic-tac-toe game, and I decided to construct types for cells (elements of the board) and the board as follows:
data Cell = X | O deriving (Show, Eq)
type Board = [[Maybe Cell]]
Here, Nothing represents an empty cell, (Just X) and (Just O) represent cells filled with X and O respectively.
I would like to define (Maybe Cell) as a monoid as follows:
instance Monoid (Maybe Cell) where
mempty = Nothing
mappend Nothing x = x
mappend (Just x) _ = (Just x)
And Board as another monoid with
instance Monoid Board where
mempty = [[Nothing, Nothing, Nothing]
,[Nothing, Nothing, Nothing]
,[Nothing, Nothing, Nothing]]
mappend = zipWith (zipWith mappend)
-- where the right-hand-side mappend is the addition on (Maybe Cell)
I know I could implement this absolutely without monoids, but I'm trying to explore the field, and it's just a really neat way to write it.
The problem that I get is that a Maybe monoid instance is already defined in GHC.Base as follows:
instance Semigroup a => Monoid (Maybe a)
This has a very different definition than what I want, but it causes duplicate instance declarations, so I can't just ignore it.
What I'm trying to do is to hide the Monoid instance of (Maybe a) from GHC.Base to avoid duplicate instances. I tried searching a lot for that, but couldn't really find a way to hide that. I can't hide all of Monoid or all of Semigroup, because I need their functions, but I need to hide this specific instance declaration. Could anyone help me with that?
NOTE: I'm using FlexibleInstances.
I standard Haskell, class instances are always “completely global”† – if a type has an instance for a given class somewhere, then this instance is used everywhere.
So, if you want to define a separate instance, you need to either have a different class – usually not practical, including in your example – or a different type, which is usually not a problem. In fact Haskell has a dedicated keyword for this kind of thing,
newtype. You simply changetype Board = [[Maybe Cell]]toand then
Likewise, instead of
Maybe Cellyou should use another type that has the suitableMonoidinstance. That one actually exists already in the base library, but it's not really necessary: you can just make a semigroup (not monoid!) instance forCellitself which represents the left-bias, thenMaybewill (since GHC-8.4) automatically have the desired behaviour.†It has actually been proposed to relax this, allowing locally-selected instances, in a paper presented at the 2018 Haskell Symposium.