Is it a performance issue if we have two or more secondary indexes on a columnfamily? I have orderid,city and shipmenttype. So I thought I create primary key on orderid and secondary indexes on city and shipmenttype. And use combination of secondary index columns while querying. Is that a bad modelling?
maximum secondary indexes on a columnfamily
226 Views Asked by john cena At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CASSANDRA
- Add additional fields to Linq group by
- couldn't copy pdb file to another directory while consuming wcf web service
- Why are the aliases for string and object in lowercase?
- WPF MessageBox Cancel checkbox check
- Resolve object using DI container with object instance
- Creating a parametrized field name for a SELECT clause
- Does compiler optimize operation on const variable and literal const number?
- Get data from one form to another form in C#
- Writing/Overwriting to specific XML file from ASP.NET code behind
- Deleting Orphans with Fluent NHibernate
Related Questions in DATA-MODELING
- Add additional fields to Linq group by
- couldn't copy pdb file to another directory while consuming wcf web service
- Why are the aliases for string and object in lowercase?
- WPF MessageBox Cancel checkbox check
- Resolve object using DI container with object instance
- Creating a parametrized field name for a SELECT clause
- Does compiler optimize operation on const variable and literal const number?
- Get data from one form to another form in C#
- Writing/Overwriting to specific XML file from ASP.NET code behind
- Deleting Orphans with Fluent NHibernate
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular # Hahtags
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
Consider the data that will be placed in the secondary index. Looking at the docs, you want to avoid columns with high cardinality. If your city and shipment type values vary greatly (or conversely, too similarly) then a secondary index may not be the right fit.
Look in to potentially maintaining a separate table with this information. This would behave as a manual index of sorts, but have the additional benefit of behaving as you expect a Cassandra table should. When you create or update records be sure to update this index table. Writes are cheap, performing multiple writes over the course of updating a record is not unheard of.
When looking at your access patterns will you be using the partition key as part of the WHERE clause or just the secondary indexes?
If you're performing a query against the secondary indexes along with the partition key you will achieve better performance than when you just query with secondary indexes.
For example, with
WHERE orderid = 'foo' AND shipmenttype = 'bar'
the request will only be sent to nodes responsible for the partition wherefoo
is stored. Then the secondary index will be consulted forshipmenttype = 'bar'
and your results will be returned.When you run a query with just
WHERE shipmenttype = 'bar'
the query is sent to all nodes in the cluster before the secondary indexes are consulted for looking up rows. This is less than ideal.Additionally should you query against multiple secondary indexes with a single request you must use
ALLOW FILTERING
. This will only consult ONE secondary index during your request, usually the more specific of the indexes referenced. This will cause a performance hit as all records returned from checking the first index will require checking for the other values listed in yourWHERE
clause.Should you be using a secondary index always strive to include the partition key portion of the query. Secondly do NOT use multiple secondary indexes when querying a table, this will cause a major performance hit.
Ultimately your performance is determined by how you construct your queries against the partition and secondary indexes.