I have a fact measure group called production it is linked to a fact dim Production details. This contains production information at line and header level. If i am selecting line level items i expect the grand totals for headers to sum the distinct value (not sum dupes) for each order. There doesn't seem to be an option in excel to specify which columns you want to grand total when connected to a cube. How do i get around this?
SSAS combining line and header quantities into one measure group
549 Views Asked by jhowe At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SSAS
- pcap to Avro on Hadoop
- schedule and automate sqoop import/export tasks
- How to diagnose Kafka topics failing globally to be found
- Only 32 bit available in Oracle VM - Hadoop Installation
- Using HDFS with Apache Spark on Amazon EC2
- How to get raw hadoop metrics
- How to output multiple values with the same key in reducer?
- Loading chararray from embedded JSON using Pig
- Oozie Pig action stuck in PREP state and job is in RUNNING state
- InstanceProfile is required for creating cluster - create python function to install module
Related Questions in SSAS-2012
- pcap to Avro on Hadoop
- schedule and automate sqoop import/export tasks
- How to diagnose Kafka topics failing globally to be found
- Only 32 bit available in Oracle VM - Hadoop Installation
- Using HDFS with Apache Spark on Amazon EC2
- How to get raw hadoop metrics
- How to output multiple values with the same key in reducer?
- Loading chararray from embedded JSON using Pig
- Oozie Pig action stuck in PREP state and job is in RUNNING state
- InstanceProfile is required for creating cluster - create python function to install module
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular # Hahtags
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?


This is the wrong design. I would change your cube and move the production header level metrics to a new fact table which has all the same dimension keys except for the Component Item dimension.
You can look for a property on the measure group called IgnoreUnrelatedDimensions. The default will repeat the header value for each item but not double count for the subtotals. Changing that setting to False will make the header values null at the item level.
But I suspect instead of using this setting you should use a many-to-many Component Item dimension similar to how we have discussed in the past.