I have a longitudinal study in which there are two treatments on day -3 but then individuals in each of these two treatments are further split into four treatments on day 0 and onward into day 2. In other words, the day -3 treatments no longer exist on days 0–2 and the day 0–2 treatments did not exist on day -3.
I would like to specify custom pairwise contrasts such that it removes all irrelevant contrasts that don't truly exist.
However, I can't quite figure out how to do this the long-hand way specifying each custom contrast based on the mean matrix nor using 'by' variables.
lm.hf <- lm(y ~ day*xtrt + sex, data=df)
emm <- emmeans(lm.hf, ~day*xtrt)
emm
day xtrt emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL
-3 MS only 18.54 1.06 132 16.44 20.64
0 MS only nonEst NA NA NA NA
2 MS only nonEst NA NA NA NA
-3 HF only 15.92 1.04 132 13.87 17.97
0 HF only nonEst NA NA NA NA
2 HF only nonEst NA NA NA NA
-3 MS:Control nonEst NA NA NA NA
0 MS:Control 13.63 1.20 132 11.26 16.00
2 MS:Control 10.65 1.20 132 8.29 13.02
-3 HF:Control nonEst NA NA NA NA
0 HF:Control 14.81 1.34 132 12.16 17.46
2 HF:Control 13.45 1.47 132 10.55 16.35
-3 MS:WT nonEst NA NA NA NA
0 MS:WT 5.66 1.16 132 3.37 7.95
2 MS:WT 9.66 1.34 132 7.00 12.32
-3 HF:WT nonEst NA NA NA NA
0 HF:WT 9.49 1.34 132 6.84 12.14
2 HF:WT 13.90 1.34 132 11.25 16.54
Results are averaged over the levels of: sex
Results are given on the sqrt (not the response) scale.
Confidence level used: 0.95
I've added a figure to provide additional clarity to the treatment design, if needed.
Instead of specifying custom contrasts, you can simply subset.
For example, to subset the non-estimable main effects, you can do:
To subset the pairwise comparisons table, you can do: