I am incredibly new to Domain Models and I am trying to build up my understanding. I have created this domain model around a scenario which I will provide. I feel this model is simple and as a result, feels incorrect and might be missing elements I might not have thought of although, I cannot think of what else might need to be included in a domain model given the scenario. The idea is to demonstrate the relationship between real world class entities which I feel I have managed to achieve.
Scenario: Management Application that allows you to create users, projects, companies and issue tickets. The projects are assigned to companies, the users are assigned to projects and the issue tickets are assigned to the users. Tickets have a status which can be changed.
Changes
Implementing proposed changes. I think this is a better way to represent the idea based on the feedback returned, especially in regards to the use of composition. I have also updated the multiplicities to better represent the scenario.
Further changes



The diagram should stay as simple as possible, but not more.
In this specific case:
Usermight be too complex for the need: aUserstays aUser, isn’t it? If you really need to take into account differences between categories of users, and especially if the category changes over time, you'd better consider (object) composition over inheritance (or better worded for UML: prefer association over inheritance).Issue ticketgets assigned to a User, isn’t it also associated to aProjector aCompany? It is not clear either ifUseris also associated toCompany(e.g. multi-tenant cloud scenario) or if there is no such association (e.g service provider scenario, where the company is in fact a customer company).