I am trying to generate the .proto of this structure:
-- MODELS --
base model
[DataContract]
public abstract class Base
{
[ProtoMember(1)]
public string Id { get; set; }
[ProtoMember(2, DataFormat = DataFormat.WellKnown)]
public DateTime CreatedDate { get; private set; } = DateTime.UtcNow;
[ProtoMember(3, DataFormat = DataFormat.WellKnown)]
public DateTime UpdatedDate { get; set; } = DateTime.UtcNow;
}
Todo model
[ProtoContract]
public class Todo : Base
{
[ProtoMember(1)]
public string Title { get; set; }
[ProtoMember(2)]
public string Content { get; set; }
[ProtoMember(3)]
public string Category { get; set; }
}
Plus this line:
RuntimeTypeModel.Default[typeof(Base)].AddSubType(42, typeof(Todo));
-- CONTRACTS --
Base contract
[ServiceContract]
public interface IBaseService<T>
{
// CREATE
[OperationContract]
Task<RStatus> CreateOneAsync(T request,CallContext context = default);
// FIND
[OperationContract]
ValueTask<T> GetById(UniqueIdentification request,CallContext context = default);
}
Todo contract
[ServiceContract]
public interface ITodoService : IBaseService<Todo>
{
// FIND
[OperationContract]
ValueTask<Todo> GetOneByQueryAsync(Query query, CallContext context = default);
}
With this generic approach, I am trying to prevent repeating code.
-- Startup.cs --
...
endpoints.MapGrpcService<TodoService>();
endpoints.MapCodeFirstGrpcReflectionService();
...
So, when I run this :
var schema = generator.GetSchema<ITodoService>();
I get this output in the .proto file:
syntax = "proto3";
package Nnet.Contracts;
import "google/protobuf/timestamp.proto";
message Base {
string Id = 1;
.google.protobuf.Timestamp CreatedDate = 2;
.google.protobuf.Timestamp UpdatedDate = 3;
oneof subtype {
Todo Todo = 42;
}
}
message IEnumerable_Todo {
repeated Base items = 1;
}
message Query {
string Filter = 1;
}
message Todo {
string Title = 1;
string Content = 2;
string Category = 3;
}
service TodoService {
rpc GetOneByQuery (Query) returns (Base);
}
In the .proto file section service Todoservice
, I am missing the other two functions from the Base contract. Also, the return type of the function rpc GetOneByQuery (Query) returns (Base);
is wrong, it should be Todo.
Any suggestions?
No, that's correct; protobuf itself has no concept of inheritance - protobuf-net has to shim it in, which it does using encapsulation, hence the
Base
with aoneof subtype
that has aTodo
. In your case, we expect that the thing passed will always actually resolve as aTodo
, but the .proto schema language has no syntax to express that. The absolute best we could do here would be to include an extra comment in the generated .proto saying// return type will always be a Todo
or similar.service inheritance and generic services are not currently well supported here; again, these are concepts that have no matching metaphor in .proto or gRPC in general, and protobuf-net would need to invent something suitable; I have not - to date - sat down and thought through any such scheme or the implications there-of. Fundamentally, the problem here is that the service contract and name are used to construct a route/url; when talking about a single service contract and method, that's fine - but when talking about service inheritance and generics, it gets a lot more complicated to uniquely identify what service you're talking about, and how that should map between a route and an implementation (and, indeed, the .proto syntax). I'm entirely open to thoughts here - it just hasn't been a critical-path requirement to date.