Question

How parameter type conversion in C++ operator works?

score 39 · Answer 1 · 2024-01-18T17:57:33.987000

39

Views

How parameter type conversion in C++ operator works?

Published on 18 January 2024 at 17:57

score 133 · Answer 2 · 2023-09-11T14:12:07.930000

133

Views

Is there any reason to mark a constructor of an abstract class as explicit

Published on 11 September 2023 at 14:12

score 469 · Answer 3 · 2023-03-14T13:23:51.353000

469

Views

error: use of deleted function operator=(&&) with std::optional

Published on 14 March 2023 at 13:23

score 159 · Answer 4 · 2022-12-17T09:58:46.300000

159

Views

Why is there no implicit conversion sequence from int to vector<double>?

Published on 17 December 2022 at 09:58

score 989 · Answer 5 · 2022-01-18T15:11:18.003000

989

Views

C++ copy assignment operator behaviour

Published on 18 January 2022 at 15:11

score 417 · Answer 6 · 2021-12-22T15:47:03.067000

417

Views

Why is my explicit constructor creating this ambiguity for my conversion operator?

Published on 22 December 2021 at 15:47

score 237 · Answer 7 · 2021-10-17T12:31:28.520000

237

Views

Why is the converting constructor preferred to the conversion operator?

Published on 17 October 2021 at 12:31

score 256 · Answer 8 · 2021-01-26T10:12:10.997000

256

Views

Can't add element into container<T> with emplace new if T has explicit constructor

Published on 26 January 2021 at 10:12

score 1.3k · Answer 9 · 2020-12-22T09:30:03.770000

1.3k

Views

C++ use of explicit suggested by cppcheck

Published on 22 December 2020 at 09:30

score 1.4k · Answer 10 · 2020-06-22T16:58:20.987000

1.4k

Views

Is there really no explicit constructor of std::string from an std::string_view?

Published on 22 June 2020 at 16:58

score 130 · Answer 11 · 2020-03-26T13:35:26.853000

130

Views

To use parameterized constructor through explicit call

Published on 26 March 2020 at 13:35

score 349 · Answer 12 · 2019-03-18T15:56:50.020000

349

Views

Why is the constructor of std::in_place_t defaulted and explicit?

Published on 18 March 2019 at 15:56

score 137 · Answer 13 · 2018-10-30T09:43:54.707000

137

Views

C++: Particularities of considering but not calling constructors

Published on 30 October 2018 at 09:43

score 134 · Answer 14 · 2018-09-23T19:53:30.240000

134

Views

Avoid spelling out type in artificially amgibuous overloaded function call

Published on 23 September 2018 at 19:53

score 280 · Answer 15 · 2018-06-10T18:21:26.933000

280

Views

Copy constructor and overloaded addition operator

Published on 10 June 2018 at 18:21

score 409 · Answer 16 · 2018-03-14T14:43:41.620000

409

Views

Why is the constructor in this C++ code ambiguous and how do I fix it?

Published on 14 March 2018 at 14:43

score 544 · Answer 17 · 2018-02-24T11:49:03.780000

544

Views

Explicit constructor still allows for implicit conversion

Published on 24 February 2018 at 11:49

score 1.7k · Answer 18 · 2018-02-12T09:05:54.280000

1.7k

Views

Initializing array through explicit constructor

Published on 12 February 2018 at 09:05

score 177 · Answer 19 · 2017-09-15T18:29:00.797000

177

Views

c++ explicit constructor called in implicit situation

Published on 15 September 2017 at 18:29

score 2.3k · Answer 20 · 2017-05-24T23:48:26.610000

2.3k

Views

Explicit default constructors in C++17

Published on 24 May 2017 at 23:48

List Question

How parameter type conversion in C++ operator works?

Is there any reason to mark a constructor of an abstract class as explicit

error: use of deleted function operator=(&&) with std::optional

Why is there no implicit conversion sequence from int to vector<double>?

C++ copy assignment operator behaviour

Why is my explicit constructor creating this ambiguity for my conversion operator?

Why is the converting constructor preferred to the conversion operator?

Can't add element into container<T> with emplace new if T has explicit constructor

C++ use of explicit suggested by cppcheck

Is there really no explicit constructor of std::string from an std::string_view?

To use parameterized constructor through explicit call

Why is the constructor of std::in_place_t defaulted and explicit?

C++: Particularities of considering but not calling constructors

Avoid spelling out type in artificially amgibuous overloaded function call

Copy constructor and overloaded addition operator

Why is the constructor in this C++ code ambiguous and how do I fix it?

Explicit constructor still allows for implicit conversion

Initializing array through explicit constructor

c++ explicit constructor called in implicit situation

Explicit default constructors in C++17

Trending Questions

Popular # Hahtags

Popular Questions