Question

When in C++14 with RVO/NRVO closed, how is the object returned?

score 129 · Answer 1 · 2023-05-21T01:28:26.580000

129

Views

When in C++14 with RVO/NRVO closed, how is the object returned?

Published on 21 May 2023 at 01:28

score 236 · Answer 2 · 2023-02-23T14:31:18.527000

236

Views

NRVO. Turning off elision. C++11 vs C++17

Published on 23 February 2023 at 14:31

score 67 · Answer 3 · 2022-08-08T15:44:46.027000

67

Views

best strategy for ensuring no copies in return by value

Published on 08 August 2022 at 15:44

score 150 · Answer 4 · 2022-06-08T08:12:59.250000

150

Views

NRVO with and without default copy constructor

Published on 08 June 2022 at 08:12

score 146 · Answer 5 · 2022-05-16T03:20:23.367000

146

Views

Shouldn't there be a copy ctor invocation here? Elision disabled (no named return value optimization)

Published on 16 May 2022 at 03:20

score 475 · Answer 6 · 2022-02-23T17:50:34.467000

475

Views

Returning a pair of objects

Published on 23 February 2022 at 17:50

score 97 · Answer 7 · 2021-06-12T18:27:49.000000

97

Views

RVO is expected, but not happening

Published on 12 June 2021 at 18:27

score 218 · Answer 8 · 2021-05-14T17:10:44.360000

218

Views

Can NRVO be turned off in debug builds?

Published on 14 May 2021 at 17:10

score 304 · Answer 9 · 2021-05-13T14:37:04.273000

304

Views

Can I avoid copies when returning multiple values, while keeping my return type?

Published on 13 May 2021 at 14:37

score 89 · Answer 10 · 2021-03-28T17:46:57.543000

89

Views

Why is NRVO not performed here (mutiple returns)?

Published on 28 March 2021 at 17:46

score 74 · Answer 11 · 2021-03-01T13:12:02.173000

74

Views

If a variable is assigned an object returned by a function, is it copied or created in-place?

Published on 01 March 2021 at 13:12

score 752 · Answer 12 · 2020-07-19T21:24:12.077000

752

Views

Why does Return Value Optimization not happen if no destructor is defined?

Published on 19 July 2020 at 21:24

score 84 · Answer 13 · 2020-06-03T06:48:26.400000

84

Views

Will structure like std::list<std::pair<string, string>> be copied when returned?

Published on 03 June 2020 at 06:48

score 5.2k · Answer 14 · 2020-05-28T09:34:15.767000

5.2k

Views

How to avoid the "pessimizing-move" warning of NRVO?

Published on 28 May 2020 at 09:34

score 63 · Answer 15 · 2020-05-02T08:39:03.547000

63

Views

Move and copy constructor in C++

Published on 02 May 2020 at 08:39

score 673 · Answer 16 · 2020-04-09T19:08:25.843000

673

Views

Copy elision (NRVO) with deleted copy and move constructors possible?

Published on 09 April 2020 at 19:08

score 3k · Answer 17 · 2020-03-05T13:16:32.403000

3k

Views

How can I ensure RVO instead of copy is performed?

Published on 05 March 2020 at 13:16

score 196 · Answer 18 · 2019-11-28T10:29:06.307000

196

Views

How to enforce RVO for operator return value?

Published on 28 November 2019 at 10:29

score 1.6k · Answer 19 · 2019-11-15T21:39:40.870000

1.6k

Views

Named Return Value Optimization when using std::optional

Published on 15 November 2019 at 21:39

score 78 · Answer 20 · 2019-10-20T21:00:16.693000

78

Views

can't find a way to make garanteed return value optimization work

Published on 20 October 2019 at 21:00

List Question

When in C++14 with RVO/NRVO closed, how is the object returned?

NRVO. Turning off elision. C++11 vs C++17

best strategy for ensuring no copies in return by value

NRVO with and without default copy constructor

Shouldn't there be a copy ctor invocation here? Elision disabled (no named return value optimization)

Returning a pair of objects

RVO is expected, but not happening

Can NRVO be turned off in debug builds?

Can I avoid copies when returning multiple values, while keeping my return type?

Why is NRVO not performed here (mutiple returns)?

If a variable is assigned an object returned by a function, is it copied or created in-place?

Why does Return Value Optimization not happen if no destructor is defined?

Will structure like std::list<std::pair<string, string>> be copied when returned?

How to avoid the "pessimizing-move" warning of NRVO?

Move and copy constructor in C++

Copy elision (NRVO) with deleted copy and move constructors possible?

How can I ensure RVO instead of copy is performed?

How to enforce RVO for operator return value?

Named Return Value Optimization when using std::optional

can't find a way to make garanteed return value optimization work

Trending Questions

Popular # Hahtags

Popular Questions