I'm attempting to use Beaver to parse a grammar that contains a reduce/reduce conflict. The conflict is expected. Other parser generators support saying something like %expect 0 1 to specify that one reduce/reduce conflict is expected, but Beaver doesn't appear to support this. How can I tell Beaver to ignore a known reduce/reduce conflict and generate a parser?
How can I tell Beaver to ignore reduce/reduce conflicts?
466 Views Asked by Michael Carman At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in JAVA
- I need the BIRT.war that is compatible with Java 17 and Tomcat 10
- Creating global Class holder
- No method found for class java.lang.String in Kafka
- Issue edit a jtable with a pictures
- getting error when trying to launch kotlin jar file that use supabase "java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError"
- Does the && (logical AND) operator have a higher precedence than || (logical OR) operator in Java?
- Mixed color rendering in a JTable
- HTTPS configuration in Spring Boot, server returning timeout
- How to use Layout to create textfields which dont increase in size?
- Function for making the code wait in javafx
- How to create beans of the same class for multiple template parameters in Spring
- How could you print a specific String from an array with the values of an array from a double array on the same line, using iteration to print all?
- org.telegram.telegrambots.meta.exceptions.TelegramApiException: Bot token and username can't be empty
- Accessing Secret Variables in Classic Pipelines through Java app in Azure DevOps
- Postgres && statement Error in Mybatis Mapper?
Related Questions in BEAVER
- How to create ERD from Heroku PostgreSQL database?
- Beaver builder other libraries
- Beaver parser generator shift-reduce conflicts connected to dangling else
- Retreiving src attribute of multiple images in a php array
- Unable to install beaver cause mosquitto is not found (debian Jessie)
- How to debug python beaver?
- entries not entering logstash filter
- Making objects in Android from regex
- How can I tell Beaver to ignore reduce/reduce conflicts?
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular # Hahtags
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
Beaver can't do that, but you can use %left, %right or %nonassoc directives to define associativity and precedence rules.
I assume that you don't care which reduce is performed in case of conflict (either because the parse trees are identical, or because they are identical for your purpose). It therefore shouldn't matter to you which precedences you define, just that you define enough precedence.
Suppose the conflict is between operators OP1 and OP2, then the following directives will resolve your conflict.
However, if the conflict is between two deduction rules with the same operator (OP), then you need either
or