Why does the range parameter for this variogram differ so wildly?
I have an estimated and fitted Generalized Least Squares variogram but the values are vastly different.
#- extract the residuals into the point observations object
cfaq.sf$res.ts2.gls <- residuals(model.ts2.gls)
vr.gls <- variogram(res.ts2.gls ~ 1, loc=cfaq.sf, cutoff = 50000)
#- plot empirical variogram
plot(vr.gls, plot.numbers=T,
main="Residuals from second-order GLS trend", cex=1,
xlab = "separation [m]", ylab = "semivariance [m^2]")
plot(vr.gls, model=vr.gls.m.f, plot.numbers=T,
xlab = "separation [m]", ylab = "semivariance [m^2]")
print(vr.gls.m.f)
model psill range
1 Nug 14.08301 0
2 Exp 1848.77165 157050
intervals(model.ts2.gls)$corStruct[2]
[1] 2049.444
Surely the range parameter of the fitted variogram should be similar to the range parameter of the of the Generalized Least Squares fit?

