I want to host a container app on Azure and I'm using Bicep to define the deployment. When I deployed the app, I was surprised to find another resource group named MC_{lots-of-random-text}_westeurope where all the expensive stuff (kubernetes, public IPs) was stored.
I'm not happy with this outcome, I would much rather have everything in one resource group, but at least I learned that this is a node resource group and Azure does not want to give me container apps without one. But can I at least give a more useful name to the node resource group? The documentation says it should be MC_myResourceGroup_myAKSCluster_eastus, but in my case, the name is just random garbage.
I tried to specify a infrastructureResourceGroup for the container app environment, but that didn't work, I just got another random name.
resource containerAppEnvironment 'Microsoft.App/managedEnvironments@2023-05-01' = {
name: containerAppEnvName
location: location
properties: {
infrastructureResourceGroup: 'actually-useful-name'
appLogsConfiguration: ...
vnetConfiguration: ...
}
}
How can I specify a custom name for the node resource group in my bicep template? Or better yet, deploy a docker container without the need for a separate node resource group?
According to the MS Doc,
infrastructureResourceGroupproperty from ManagedEnvironmentProperties of app managed environments resource will be used to provide name of a managed resource group created of the Managed Environment to host infrastructure resources.Try with the latest Api version which is
2023-08-01-preview. I tried same in my environment and was able to deploy it as expected.Alternatively, you can also control the resource group creation from where your cluster is deployed. Use resource group and location properties to achieve that.
Microsoft.ContainerService/managedClusters