I am a newbie in java and was wondering "Why default constructor is not provided by compiler when class contains parametrized constructor defined by user?"
Why default constructor is not provided by compiler when class contains parametrized constructor defined by user?
347 Views Asked by Shivangi Arora At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in JAVA
- I need the BIRT.war that is compatible with Java 17 and Tomcat 10
- Creating global Class holder
- No method found for class java.lang.String in Kafka
- Issue edit a jtable with a pictures
- getting error when trying to launch kotlin jar file that use supabase "java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError"
- Does the && (logical AND) operator have a higher precedence than || (logical OR) operator in Java?
- Mixed color rendering in a JTable
- HTTPS configuration in Spring Boot, server returning timeout
- How to use Layout to create textfields which dont increase in size?
- Function for making the code wait in javafx
- How to create beans of the same class for multiple template parameters in Spring
- How could you print a specific String from an array with the values of an array from a double array on the same line, using iteration to print all?
- org.telegram.telegrambots.meta.exceptions.TelegramApiException: Bot token and username can't be empty
- Accessing Secret Variables in Classic Pipelines through Java app in Azure DevOps
- Postgres && statement Error in Mybatis Mapper?
Related Questions in DEFAULT-CONSTRUCTOR
- Why do we still need to implement 'noArgsConstructor' if Java gives a non-parameterized constructor by default?
- What value to assign to a char* in default constructor c++?
- Initialization of object in a class
- Are these three default constructors equivalent in C++?
- Using default constructor to set the object attribute to default value in C++
- why default constructor is not used in value initialisation in c++
- Non-aggregate initialization
- Could an implicit compiler created default constructor have more than a null body?
- C# default constructor even if there is an explicit constructor
- How to write conditional instantiation in C#
- Why is the explicitly defaulted default constructor implicitly deleted when there is a const std::vector data member?
- Why do I need to specify the type of a default constructed object in this situation?
- initializing from empty std::initializer_list vs default constructor
- initialize array of object without default constructor
- Is there a way to implement the same behaviour of the new operator calling default constructors?
Related Questions in PARAMETERIZED-CONSTRUCTOR
- Why do we still need to implement 'noArgsConstructor' if Java gives a non-parameterized constructor by default?
- What does `const&` mean in `const char* const& _str`?
- Using a constraint with a parmeterized constructor in Spring Boot application
- Julia parametric constructor and incomplete initialization
- Proguard doesn't keep access modifier in parameterized constructor
- Creating a parameterized constructor to determine upper bound for randomized side lengths
- Different ways to initialize object field with parameter
- If final variable is initialized in parameterized constructor dynamically, then it breaks final rule
- Parameterized MVC6 WebApi constructor not calling using Ninject
- when is it obligatory to define constructors in subclasses?
- Pytests: getting error function uses no argument error
- Why default constructor is not provided by compiler when class contains parametrized constructor defined by user?
- Instantiating class with interfaces in c#
- NUnit: How can I set name of test depending on parametr in [TestFixture(typeof(param))]
- Java Optional.orElseThrow signature explanation
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular # Hahtags
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
When an author decides to not provide any constructor, it is perfectly fine that the compiler adds that default constructor. Obviously the user doesn't care "how" objects of that class are created, he accepts that the "default" kicks in.
But as soon as the author writes down a constructor with parameters, it is also obvious that he assumes that one of his constructors gets used.
The straight forward reasoning: assume your class has multiple fields, and the user-written constructor initializes all of them. What should the compiler-generated default constructor do about these fields?! And as one of the comments pointed out: leaving them at
nullor maybe 0 isn't a good idea.