We have a very large Mercurial repository - about 11GB with approximately 130,000 commits. I am trying to convert it to git using the hggit extension of Mercurial, and I am having a strange experience.
As a side note, I am doing this on Windows 10
First, I create an empty directory, and call git init to initialize the git repository.
Then, I go to the hg directory and issue the (unusual to me) command hg bookmark hg as per a few articles I read.
Then, I issue hg push c:\path\to\repo
Here is the result:
It appears that the repository was successfully processed and pushed.
However, when I go to the git repository directory, it is empty, except for the .git directory. In that git directory, all the tags are present, and there is a large *.pack file of about 11GB, which I assume is related to our repository, given the size.
I thought that I needed to checkout a branch before the files would show up, but an attempt to checkout a recent branch results in:
error: pathspec 'rio' did not match any file(s) known to git.
So my question is: What do I need to do to get my files to appear in the git respository?

Run
git tag --listandgit branch --listto view the actual names of the references created by yourhg pushcommand.You can then checkout the appropriate branch or tag.
If you want to create a branch with a more explicit name, run the regular command :
For example : if you want to create a
masterbranch starting from the same point as the branch namedhg:(following the link posted in comment by @torek) : hg-git's Readme, "Usage" section
If you want to create more branches from specific points in your mercurial repo, you will have to bookmark them.
Extra details about branches :
I'm not used to Mercurial, but from what I gathered, branches in Mercurial are objects, which have distinct attributes (such as : when was it created ? by who ? etc ...),
as opposed to git, where branches are just shallow references to commits, which can be automatically updated (e.g : with
git commit,git merge, etc ...).For example : in git, with the following diagram :
You can find info about each individual commit (each
*in the diagram) : who created it, when was it committed, etc ...but you cannot say for sure if
developstarted ataandfeature1started atx, or if it was the other way around.The doc for hg-git states, in its "branch_bookmark_suffix" paragraph, that this is the reason why
hg-gitmapsgitbranches tohgbookmarks, and that you should double your branches with bookmarks. See the example I posted as another answer to this question.