Why is the kiss_fft's forward and inverse radix-4 calculation different, part 2?

Question

Part 1 - why the code below checks st_inverse in the first place

The kiss_fft code has this branch inside a loop:

do {
    if(st->inverse) {
        Fout[m].r = scratch[5].r - scratch[4].i;
        Fout[m].i = scratch[5].i + scratch[4].r;
        Fout[m3].r = scratch[5].r + scratch[4].i;
        Fout[m3].i = scratch[5].i - scratch[4].r;
    }else{
        Fout[m].r = scratch[5].r + scratch[4].i;
        Fout[m].i = scratch[5].i - scratch[4].r;
        Fout[m3].r = scratch[5].r - scratch[4].i;
        Fout[m3].i = scratch[5].i + scratch[4].r;
    }
    ++Fout;
} while (--k); // Fout[] has k*4 elements.

Slightly reordered:

if(st->inverse) {
    Fout[m].r = scratch[5].r - scratch[4].i;
    Fout[m].i = scratch[5].i + scratch[4].r;
    Fout[m3].r = scratch[5].r + scratch[4].i;
    Fout[m3].i = scratch[5].i - scratch[4].r;
}else{
    Fout[m3].r = scratch[5].r - scratch[4].i;
    Fout[m3].i = scratch[5].i + scratch[4].r
    Fout[m].r = scratch[5].r + scratch[4].i;
    Fout[m].i = scratch[5].i - scratch[4].r;;
}

The two code blocks really differ only in their use of m and m3. But m and m3 are not changed inside the loop. Can I simply eliminate this inner-loop branch by swapping m and m3 ?

if(st->inverse) { swap(&m, &m3); }
do {
    Fout[m].r = scratch[5].r - scratch[4].i;
    Fout[m].i = scratch[5].i + scratch[4].r;
    Fout[m3].r = scratch[5].r + scratch[4].i;
    Fout[m3].i = scratch[5].i - scratch[4].r;
   ++Fout;
} while (--k);

Answer 1

I can indeed use that optimization. It's not necessary however with current-gen compilers that can use AVX. They'll eliminate that branch as well, using vpcmpeqd and vblendvps.